Pricing

Priced for a solo practice or a small team — not an enterprise contract.

No usage surprises: a flat monthly rate with a real included allowance, plus straightforward overage if you go past it. Currently in pilot — book a call before choosing a tier.

Solo
$49–$79/mo
~500K tokens/month included
Full redaction pipeline — regex + on-device name/address detection
Single-user account
Precision Mode (accuracy-first, no paraphrasing)
Standard accountability agreement
Practice
$149–$249/mo
~2–3M tokens/month included · 2–5 seats
Everything in Solo
Multiple seats for your team
Signed BAA available (healthcare)
§7216 consent-language templates (tax/accounting)
Priority pilot support
Firm / Multi-office
Custom
Volume-based allowance
Everything in Practice
Multiple offices / larger seat counts
Custom accountability & audit-trail terms
Direct line to the team building this
Overage: if you go past your included allowance in a given month, additional usage is billed per block at a modest markup over raw cost — no surprise cutoffs, no forced upgrade mid-month.
For firms with 6+ people

Volume pricing, by seat

Tokens pool across your whole team — a light user and a heavy user balance out naturally, no per-person caps to manage. Support-staff seats (paralegals, admin) are priced lower than attorney/CPA seats.

Seats Full seat (attorney / CPA) Light seat (paralegal / support) Example
6-25 seats $35/seat/mo $18/seat/mo 10-person tax practice → $350/mo
26-75 seats $28/seat/mo $14/seat/mo 50 lawyers + 20 paralegals → $1,680/mo
76+ seats Custom, negotiated Talk to us

For scale: ChatGPT Enterprise has a 150-seat minimum and starts around $45-75/seat. This pricing is built for the firms in between — too big for a solo tier, too small for an enterprise contract.

Why not usage-only pricing? Metered-only billing creates unpredictable monthly bills, which is exactly what professionals evaluating a new tool don't want. A flat tier with a real included allowance is easier to budget against.
Why not unlimited? Unlimited plans quietly rely on light users subsidizing heavy ones. We'd rather be upfront about what's included and let you add capacity if you need it, than build a plan that only works because most people don't use it fully.