Your associates are already using ChatGPT and Claude for drafting and research. We strip out the identifying details — client names, case numbers, SSNs — before anything leaves your device, while the substance of your work still gets a real answer. Backed by a signed accountability agreement, not a privacy policy nobody reads.
Currently piloting with a small number of firms — no cost to look.
Tools like Harvey, CoCounsel, and Lexis+ AI exist to make legal research and case citations trustworthy — that's a different, harder problem, and one we don't try to solve. This is for the drafting and client communication your team is already doing in raw ChatGPT or Claude: demand letters, intake summaries, client emails — places where you already supply the facts and just want help with the language.
Even there, a model can still drift — inventing a case name, a date, or a dollar figure to make a draft feel complete. Before your device restores the real names, we check the AI's response against what you actually sent it, and flag anything it introduced that you didn't. It doesn't replace your judgment or a citation checker — it makes sure the model isn't quietly adding things you never told it.
| Raw ChatGPT / Claude | PrivacyAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Client names & identifying details tokenized before sending | No | Yes |
| Flags facts, citations, or figures the AI added that you didn't provide | No | Yes |
| Signed accountability agreement | No | Yes |
| Audit trail if a client or the bar ever asks | No | Yes |
| Same Claude / GPT quality your team already uses | Yes | Yes |
| Priced for a firm your size | Yes (but unprotected) | Yes |
15 minutes, no pressure — we'll show you exactly what your associates' current AI use looks like from the outside, and what changes with this in place.
Book a 15-minute call