● For clinicians & small practices

Patient identifiers should never touch an AI company's servers.

Clinicians are already using ChatGPT and Claude for case summaries, patient education, and prior-auth letters. We strip out identifying details — patient names, record numbers — before anything reaches those servers, with a signed BAA behind it, not a promise.

Book a 15-minute call See how it works

Currently piloting with a small number of practices — no cost to look.

The part most practices haven't dealt with yet

Most practices don't have a policy on what goes into ChatGPT or Claude — and clinicians are already using it informally to draft notes, patient handouts, or think through a case. That likely means patient details are reaching OpenAI's or Anthropic's servers without a signed BAA covering it.

Not a competitor to your scribe tool

If you use Abridge or Dragon Copilot

Those handle the visit — recording the conversation and generating the structured note. That's a different job, and a good one already being done well.

This covers everything else

Patient education materials, case summaries before a visit, prior-authorization letters, literature review — the general AI use that doesn't fit a scribe tool but still involves patient details.

How this compares to what your practice is doing today

	Raw ChatGPT / Claude	PrivacyAI Gateway
Patient identifiers tokenized before sending	No	Yes
Signed Business Associate Agreement	No	Yes
Audit trail if it's ever asked about	No	Yes
Same Claude / GPT quality your staff already uses	Yes	Yes

See it working before you commit to anything.

15 minutes, no pressure — we'll show you what your staff's current AI use looks like from the outside, and what changes with this in place.

Book a 15-minute call